Was the Followup Car Blocking a Shot at Z313?

[David Josephs]

Hi Dave

I should point out to everyone that if you had not posted material about WCD 298 a while back, I likely would still not have heard about it, and I am eternally grateful to you for this. As I tell people, though, I am a slow learner, and it often takes me a while to fully "embrace" information, as you put it so well.

So, am I to understand, from Redlich's memo to Rankin, that, as of April 27, 1964, the WC was still supporting the concept of three bullets making three separate hits on Connally and JFK? The switcheroo over to the SBT must have taken place almost over night, as it was not long after this that the WCR was released, wasn't it? Small wonder so many of the commissioners had doubts about the SBT, outside of the fact it was physically impossible.

As I said in my first post, the thing I finally clued into about WCD 298 (and it took me long enough) was, how did the FBI identify the position down by the steps, 307 feet from the Sniper's Nest, as the location of the head shot? As the head shot was so graphic and unmistakable, does this prove the FBI was watching a different version of the Z film than we are allowed to see? How else could trained investigators get the head shot location so wrong?

Hey there Bob... (gee I hope that didn't come off wrong... I was just excited to see you finally tackle WCD298 and what it meant... Amazes me that more of our little group does not embrace the lies formulated in that exhibit...)

The WCR was published Sept 24, 1964... 6 months later.
I forget when Tague's injury finally comes to the surface to make them change to the SBT - but the SBT made it into the extent autopsy report somehow which was finalized in mid Dec I believe.

We are not entirely sure which reports he is referring to... WCD 1 & 3 as a start yet there were MANY reports from the FBI and SS on the Zfilm and Dealey plaza and the shooting that reach the WC by April. WCD 77, 78, 79, 87, 88, 320 are some of the SS reports and there are tons of FBI reports.... there is alos the possibilty that by April - as the memo says - they KNEW what they were goping to write and conclude and these FBI reports were not corroborating it... so they better fix it!... could be another take on that memo...

This exhibit was prepared by a team headed by FBI SA Gauthier - his testimony is available... the Commissioners see this in January.

"What sources did they use to place the shots where they did?" has been my question for this entire time.... they had films, photos, survbeys and plans. They obvious had the Zfilm which contradicts the conclusions of this display yet they went ahead with it anyway. The WCR Exhibit though destroys what the model was trying to show...