Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon?
#33
Peter Lemkin Wrote:top view of WTC 6....hard to explain what 'giant' stepped on it....

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6453&stc=1] The hole went down to the sub-basement and contained surprisingly LITTLE of the materials from the structure above. It was also 'too clean' a cut to be explained by falling debris. While there were some beams sent in that direction, NONE were large chunks - not large enough to cause this...anyway, such large chunks were NOT found in the hole. No official explanation even attempts to explain this - which also happened to two other smaller WTC buildings. Most of what can be seen in the bottom of the hole are exterior cladding from the larger WTC's 1 &2 - these were not very heavy and shouldn't have created this hole...I think they just fell into a hole that was alread there...as other pieces lie on the portions of the roof still intact.



Question for all: Was there any organization or installation of interest located in WTC 6 that would call for the blasting out of the "hole" that consumed several floors at that internal location?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - by David Andrews - 25-02-2015, 06:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The KEY to unlocking the 'official lie' of 9-11-01 is there was TOO MUCH ENERGY INVOLVED! Peter Lemkin 28 26,828 06-10-2013, 06:41 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Pentagon's non-lethal weapon projects leaked - including a laser beam that 'steers enemy planes' Ed Jewett 0 3,091 06-01-2012, 11:54 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)