David Mantik's Definitive look at the Harper Fragment

[Jim Hargrove]

The wiki image is deceiving.
The occipital area is not just as illustrated, recommend reviewing other images to see.

Yes, I see what you mean. Some images show the occiput extending quite a bit higher than the one I posted from Wikipedia, although several others show it similarly positioned. (I'd post some examples here, but I don't want to push "fair use" copyright considerations too far. These images are easy to find.)

But even using the most extreme examples of an illustration depicting a high occipital area, I believe my original point still stands. There is simply no picture I can find on the net, including the one DJ posted above, showing the occiput extending high enough on a human skull that would allow the shard shown in the Dox diagram to be described as occipital or even partly occipital. It is simply too far forward on the head. And this, I believe, is the essential deception the HSCA and a host of other apologists have put forth over the decades.

What does it matter what the government tools and pundits claim should be seen, what can you see?

The government's deceptions matter a great deal to me, on this issue, on this case, and on a great many other questions of our time. When the government lies, every other liar with a similar tale to sell has a dependable sanctuary.