28-04-2015, 03:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2015, 03:50 AM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Its actually even worse than that. Regis Kennedy knew that Shaw had done work for the CIA in Italy for about five years. (Destiny Betrayed, second edition, p. 386)
BTW, one of the things that clued me in about Roy/Blatburst--one of several--was when he tried to say that Dean Andrews didn't really describe Shaw to a T in his WC testimony.
I replied that well, what do you expect, the guy was fearful for his life.
With a straight face, Roy/Blatburst tried to say there really was no reason for that.
I had to go through the litany of Lane, Garrison, Summers all interviewing him and him saying he had been threatened.
How bad is this guy? When Martin Hay dragged out the final piece of evidence that Shaw was Bertrand, that is a long buried interview that Weisberg did with Andrews in which Harold said he would not surface the contents of the disclosure until after he was dead, well Roy/Blatburst tried to dismiss that also! Because Andrews said Bertrand was Shaw. That piece of evidence corroborates about 14 or 15 others that I collected in the second edition of Destiny Betrayed. (See pgs. 387-88) Today this is simply undeniable. To everyone except Carpenter and Roy/Blatburst.
BTW, if you need anything else to cinch Roy/Blatburst as a troll, take a look at the Education Forum and see that DVP, Mr Irrational Man, has started two nonsense threads. (And BTW, he also uses that 59 % figure of doubters of the WR which was an outlier. There are three other polls that came out which were all at 75%.) Well, who comes to his aid, good ole Roy/Blatburst who says as he alway does when people question other researchers motives, well that is Tin Hat land.
LOL. Oh really like John McAdams, with his CIA commercials on his acapella radio station?
But yet, with all those newbies over there, Roy/Blatburst still suckers some people. And this of course, aids Von Pein.
Incredible that no one sees through this act over there.
BTW, one of the things that clued me in about Roy/Blatburst--one of several--was when he tried to say that Dean Andrews didn't really describe Shaw to a T in his WC testimony.
I replied that well, what do you expect, the guy was fearful for his life.
With a straight face, Roy/Blatburst tried to say there really was no reason for that.
I had to go through the litany of Lane, Garrison, Summers all interviewing him and him saying he had been threatened.
How bad is this guy? When Martin Hay dragged out the final piece of evidence that Shaw was Bertrand, that is a long buried interview that Weisberg did with Andrews in which Harold said he would not surface the contents of the disclosure until after he was dead, well Roy/Blatburst tried to dismiss that also! Because Andrews said Bertrand was Shaw. That piece of evidence corroborates about 14 or 15 others that I collected in the second edition of Destiny Betrayed. (See pgs. 387-88) Today this is simply undeniable. To everyone except Carpenter and Roy/Blatburst.
BTW, if you need anything else to cinch Roy/Blatburst as a troll, take a look at the Education Forum and see that DVP, Mr Irrational Man, has started two nonsense threads. (And BTW, he also uses that 59 % figure of doubters of the WR which was an outlier. There are three other polls that came out which were all at 75%.) Well, who comes to his aid, good ole Roy/Blatburst who says as he alway does when people question other researchers motives, well that is Tin Hat land.
LOL. Oh really like John McAdams, with his CIA commercials on his acapella radio station?
But yet, with all those newbies over there, Roy/Blatburst still suckers some people. And this of course, aids Von Pein.
Incredible that no one sees through this act over there.