Blatburst-Roy, Carpenter and Holland

[Jim DiEugenio]

Yeah, I saw that too and I added to my post above about it.

Wow, what chutzpah.

And man now the EF has fallen: Von Pein and Roy. Bad cop, good cop.

BTW, Roy/Blatburst is also pushing the whole line of rigamarole about him being a careful researcher.

This is the guy who wrote that when the cut Z frames are inserted into the Z film at around 207 forward, that still does not prove a conspiracy.

HA HA HA LOL

See, those excised frames clearly show Kennedy's head buckling from an impact. And when Groden first showed them at Harvard in 1993, the audience was shocked since it was on a big screen with very good resolution.

Everyone realized why Hoover had cut those frames. Because the WC wrote that Oswald could not have gotten a shot off at that point since his vision was blocked by the branches of an oak tree. If you can believe it even Dunacan McRae said it looked like he was hit before he went behind the sign. (DVP went nuts when he said that, of course.) The HSCA photo panel also said this was the case.

But not that "careful researcher" Roy/Blatburst. The troll who feels fine at Max Holland's site.