Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blatburst-Roy, Carpenter and Holland
#46
Blackburst is fair game. He's a Lone Nutter who uses the classic Lone Nut method (ala Bugliosi) of whitewashing the evidence in phony high rigor analysis while fully intending to lose incriminating content in diversionary volume. He then pleads that he is only being objective and following higher standards. If you read the Amazon comments section for his review he had every chance to answer for it but didn't. There's a modern element in Million Fragments​ of using Shaw's gay-ness as a contemporary focus. Sort of like switching the subject and trying to humanize Shaw as a progressive gay man. It's obvious the only reason Carpenter is doing that is because he's trying to shift attention from Shaw's wolf status and participation in the assassination.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Blatburst-Roy, Carpenter and Holland - by Albert Doyle - 28-04-2015, 04:00 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Max Holland Duped the Daily Beast Jim DiEugenio 3 6,206 24-06-2017, 07:08 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Max Holland and Donald Carpenter vs Jim Garrison and the ARRB Jim DiEugenio 63 46,579 11-05-2017, 05:30 AM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  Oliver Stone's Response to Philip Zelikow and Max Holland, 2002 Robert Morrow 9 11,709 04-01-2011, 06:46 AM
Last Post: Phil Dragoo
  Oswald in holland Steve Duffy 1 3,158 04-05-2010, 06:55 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)