06-05-2015, 12:29 AM
Drew Phipps Wrote:You can just take the "facts" that I presented above as the public testimony under oath of the persons involved. You can choose to believe John's conclusions, and work backwards from there, assuming that everyone is lying through their teeth, but that's what the people involved said when they were given the chance.
Drew... you are mistaken.
The "facts" you presented were bass-ackwards and I showed you why.
If you can support what you posted as facts with links or evidence please do so... I took the time to show you what they actually said and what H&L actually says... not my interpretation of it or what you think John thinks...
Present the sources and the evidence if you disagree... but don't shove these "facts" down our throats as if they were researched and supported if you are not going to offer any corroboration...
and then get all bothered when it is pointed out to you...
Believing the conclusions John assembled from the evidence he found is pretty straightforward... the MO the WC questioned was NOT these boys' mother, nor was she ever married to Pic or Oswald... and her testimony repeatedly gives her away. The last time we have Oswald with his real mother was when they left for NYC. When they come back to the south via North Dakota, the switch had been made.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter