Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blatburst-Roy, Carpenter and Holland
#68
I beg to disagree with two guys who I like, but I do.

First of all, I would not call David Phillips part of the lower level. He was at the mid level. And if you read my book, the second edition of Destiny Betrayed, you will see that he was the CIA's man in charge of their anti FPCC campaign (along with McCord). And this is clearly what Oswald was doing that summer in the Crescent City.

Further, as you can also see in my book, there is good evidence that Phillips had met with Arcacha Smith and Banister at 544 Camp Street the year before. And then there is the training camp film that Tanenbaum and others saw while at the HSCA, which features Phillips, Oswald and Banister.

Then of course there is Phillips in MC lying his head off about just about everything to cover up the fact that the CIA was setting up Oswald even further there.

As per Garrison, I think you have swallowed some Reitzian, Blatburst,Summers/Hoch disinfo. Its true that at the start Garrison was involved in a hall of mirrors and could not really decipher what the heck was going on. This is why he let CIA plants like De Torres into his office. But by the summer of 1967, he had decided that CIA was the main perp in the crime. You can tell this by reading the Playboy interview which was conducted that summer. The Ramparts article does not actually say LBJ was in on the plot; it says he benefited from the plot and was in on the cover up. Which is true.

As per the Corliss Lamont flyer, I don't quite get what you are trying to say. I thought that that flyer, along with other paraphernalia, was given to the FBI upon Oswald's arrest. Therefore it would not be in the DPD's hands at the time of the assassination. But the stamp on it was done with a rubber and ink stamp. And such a kit is in the WC volumes. Now if it did not belong to Oswald, who did it belong to?

And why would the FBI and WC put it there if it did not?

The FBI and WC relied on the whole 544 Camp street scene being covered up forever. This is why Ferrie was allowed to lie his head off to the FBI and why the WC never interviewed Banister or SAS. And why the FBI covered up the fact they knew that Shaw was Bertrand.

They understood how important all this was to keeping Oswald as the sociopathic communist they needed him to be. If not, a keystone of the cover up would collapse. Garrison screwed all that up for them.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Blatburst-Roy, Carpenter and Holland - by Jim DiEugenio - 25-05-2015, 02:53 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Max Holland Duped the Daily Beast Jim DiEugenio 3 6,250 24-06-2017, 07:08 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Max Holland and Donald Carpenter vs Jim Garrison and the ARRB Jim DiEugenio 63 47,373 11-05-2017, 05:30 AM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  Oliver Stone's Response to Philip Zelikow and Max Holland, 2002 Robert Morrow 9 11,793 04-01-2011, 06:46 AM
Last Post: Phil Dragoo
  Oswald in holland Steve Duffy 1 3,182 04-05-2010, 06:55 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)