13-06-2015, 05:37 PM
Jim: Great post. To me Rachel is the typical liberal. For all her education she has no interest in historical truth. She believes the MSM bullshit on these matters and digs no deeper. I have been dealing with higher educated people on these issues for all of my 30 years as a lawyer. They just do not want to know. Joe Six pack is easily convinced of the truth about JFK. But for those entrenched in the establishment there is a blinder. Perhaps Marty Schotz best described this ailment. People like this use circular logic. I just went through it with a high powered lawyer here in TX. Blind on purpose and nothing I said could change his mind. The few times I have gotten an attorney to even look at a video or read a book it only "took" for a few days then they went back to not caring. Plus Rachel would lose her job if she were to speak the truth on MSM. She likes her job. I sent her an email once but got no reply. Remember when we all tried to reach Peter Jennings on the 40th and how that accomplished nothing. People like this are the reason highly educated people refuse to believe in conspiracy. They do not grasp or accept that the media would be involved in the cover up. It' s just too great a leap for them. I could not get this lawyer to even read an Amazon review of JFKU. He agreed only to read one from the f'ing NYT. So I gave up and ended the conversation. (He had made a bunch of anti conspiracy comments on my fb page when I posed as my status a question to my fb JFK assassination friends how and when they each decided it was a conspiracy. So he just interjected his ignorant opinion against several posters. Finally I sent him RFK jr's view of this book and he did not reply.
Dawn
Dawn
