10-08-2015, 01:36 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2015, 05:25 AM by Miles Scull.)
Tom Scully Wrote:Miles Scull Wrote:Tom Scully Wrote:https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2...0634&hl=en
This Miami News article of Nov. 25 is bogus and is indicative of a CIA hand at work at an OP to convict Oswald.
Wade never said that Oswald carried "a large paper-wrapped parcel" and Wade never said that a neighbor was told by Oswald that the "package" (Wade's term) "contained rolled curtains, but actually was a gun."
What Wade actually said has been stated in previous posts on this thread.
SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz_5KLrvBLk
Again, this is more clutching at straws via fudge production.
I tnink I'm finally getting the hang of this. Whatever your interpretation of and weighting of this information is, IS WHAT IT IS. If you decide an FBI agent has used wording that fits your beliefs, it
is rock solid, take it to the bank evidence. If the wording in an FBI report seems to undermine your beliefs, you point out it is sourced from the corrupt, malevolent FBI. A newspaper report is worded in
a way you object to, and.....it was planted by the CIA. Heads you win, tails I lose! This is fun......for you......
Nonsense straw clutching.
Harrison's 27 November reporting of his 26 November Yates interview is the FIRST report made by the FBI regarding Yates. Therefore, this first report logically can be accepted as accurate because the need to suppress Yates' reporting was not immediately perceived and such suppression was not activated immediately. But suppression was soon after activated, especially when Hoover realized the danger. Subsequent FBI reporting is a hatchet job obviously ordered by Hoover.
The Miami News article of the 25th misquotes Wade. It puts words in Wade's mouth he did not utter. Furthermore, is someone saying that Yates read the Miami paper on the 25th? :
:No one has as yet found a Dallas newspaper article which stated Yates' reporting information to the FBI on the 26th.