23-06-2013, 01:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-06-2013, 01:26 PM by Albert Doyle.)
It is a pretty significant schism from some of the main investigators that never happened in the Kennedy Assassination. They are a little too obsequious, but that's because they are insiders asking their superiors to take a look at their own corruption. The hens are asking the foxes to examine their doings in the hen house.
There's a couple of prima facie examples of forensic evidence there like the splatter found across the outside of the center fuel tank that was laid down before the tank exploded. And the mach 4 asymmetrical ejecta that conforms perfectly to a missile impacting from the port side and exploding in the continuing direction.
I wish the tall white haired man, Mike Wire, told the viewers about the bridge shaking violently. A fuel explosion can't shake a bridge at 20 miles and is also prima facie evidence of high explosive.
There's a couple of prima facie examples of forensic evidence there like the splatter found across the outside of the center fuel tank that was laid down before the tank exploded. And the mach 4 asymmetrical ejecta that conforms perfectly to a missile impacting from the port side and exploding in the continuing direction.
I wish the tall white haired man, Mike Wire, told the viewers about the bridge shaking violently. A fuel explosion can't shake a bridge at 20 miles and is also prima facie evidence of high explosive.