21-08-2013, 05:04 AM
Magda says this at post #480 in the Szamboti thread:
OK, for the sake of discussion, let's agree with Magda that CD is not a primary factor in 911. She says, in the greater scheme, it is a deep political event with specific beneficiaries.
OK, what does make it a deep political event and who indeed are the specific beneficiaries? How would one claim to know that it is a deep political event and not something else? What would that something else be? Are the "specific beneficiaries" the sponsors, the false sponsors, the facilitators, and/or the mechanics? Does the Drago/Evica model even apply?
Quote:But the existence or not of CD doesn't impact in the greater scheme of 911 being a deep political event with specific beneficiaries. There is no definitive position on it that I can see. And those that have an opinion, of any sort, on it do keep coming back again and again....
OK, for the sake of discussion, let's agree with Magda that CD is not a primary factor in 911. She says, in the greater scheme, it is a deep political event with specific beneficiaries.
OK, what does make it a deep political event and who indeed are the specific beneficiaries? How would one claim to know that it is a deep political event and not something else? What would that something else be? Are the "specific beneficiaries" the sponsors, the false sponsors, the facilitators, and/or the mechanics? Does the Drago/Evica model even apply?
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl