Bill Simpich's State Secret is completed

[Peter Lemkin]

I had not finished the work - which I find very well thought out and done [from what I had read], as I was waiting for it to be completed. Right at the begining, Simpich states something profound. It is not exactly new, but is stated in a clear way that makes old information visible in a new light...:

Strong evidence is provided in this book that both Oswald andDuran were impersonated on these tapes. Furthermore, I believe thatGoodpasture realized during September 1963 that someone had found outabout the CIA's Mexico City wiretap operation. Theimpersonation of Oswald and Duran meant that the Agency had to takeaction to ensure its security. Goodpasture got together with theoffices of covert action chief Dick Helms and CI chief Jim Angletonand launched an operation to try to figure out who had done it andwhy. It all blew up in their faces on 11/22/63, when the man who hadbeen impersonated was named as JFK's assassin.
When President Kennedy was shot down in Dallas, the CIA and theircolleagues at the FBI were effectively blackmailed. If their Oswaldmemos written prior to the assassination had been made public in thewake of JFK's death, public reaction would have been furious. If the word got out that CIA officers knew that Oswald had been impersonated prior to the assassination, this would imply both that Oswald had been set up for the assassination (which was presumably carried out by others), and that the CIA could have prevented JFK's death if it had reacted differently. The response would have been tectonic.

Tectonic indeed!...and any good Sherlock Holmes would have followed this trail - as it surely leads to those who planned the event[s] - perhaps even those who instigated them. Simpich has now made a stab at just that. I need to finish the work to comment fully. It certainly does deserve our attention, and consideration of its evidence and conclusions.