Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon?
#11
I'm still trying to get my head around the question where did the rubble go. The twin towers amounted to, I understand, 1.2 million tons. They were they world largest office blocks with what, 50,000/60,000 office workers based there? That's 50/60,000 desks, telephone, computer stations, thousand of boardroom tables, kitchen equipment etc - not counting the vast array of steel struts that were the bones of both buildings. One fireman who survived the collapse asks the question. He said (it's in the above clip) where were the desks and phones? He was completely bemused that there were none that he could see as he made his way out of the remains.

Can anyone explain this?
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - by David Guyatt - 28-11-2014, 09:04 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The KEY to unlocking the 'official lie' of 9-11-01 is there was TOO MUCH ENERGY INVOLVED! Peter Lemkin 28 19,777 06-10-2013, 06:41 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Pentagon's non-lethal weapon projects leaked - including a laser beam that 'steers enemy planes' Ed Jewett 0 2,093 06-01-2012, 11:54 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)