25-12-2015, 09:05 PM
O. Austrud Wrote:Are you talking about this?
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/HWNA...dixII.html
YES!!!!! Thank you so much. Here is one very important excerpt:
It says the third editor to express his opinion, Carbo, who is director of the Executive Council of the Inter-American Press Association which is a very important job in the intellectual sectors of reaction and the oligarchy emphasized that there were not strong statements in favor of the liberation of Cuba like the statements that had been made in previous speeches by President Kennedy, especially in the one he made after the heroic battle of Playa Giron that "heroic battle" where every one of them ended defeated and imprisoned forecasting the crisis of the communist regime of Cuba. He claims in "Cuba the situation of the government verges on the insoluble, economically, politically and internationally since Castro is no longer reliable, not even to Russia."
But most important of all is how the statement made by this gentleman who holds an important post in reactionary intellectual circles in the United States and abroad as Director of the Executive Council of the Inter-American Press Association, how his statement ends and this is what drew my attention. The editor of the confiscated Havana newspaper ended by saying: "I believe a coming serious event will oblige Washington to change its policy of peaceful co-existence." What does this mean? What did this gentleman mean when he said this three days before the assassination of Kennedy? What did this gentleman who holds an utmost post in the ultra-reactionary intellectual circles in and outside of the United States, the Director of the Executive Council of the Inter-American Press Association, mean in a cable that is not from Prensa Latina, but from Associated Press, dated November 19th AP Num, 254, AP November 19th, Miami Beach when he said: "I believe that a coming serious event will oblige Washington to change its policy of peaceful co-existence?"
What does this mean, three days before the murder of President Kennedy? Because when I read this cable it caught my attention, it intrigued me, it seemed strange to me. Was there perhaps some sort of understanding? Was there perhaps some sort of thought about this? Was there perhaps some kind of plot? Was there perhaps in those reactionary circles where the so-called weak policy of Kennedy toward Cuba was under attack, where the policy of ending nuclear threat was under attack, where the policy of civil rights was under attack. . . . Was there perhaps in certain civilian and military ultra-reactionary circles in the United States, a plot against President Kennedy's life?
Castro knew then and he knows now. Amazing speech.
Dawn