29-03-2016, 06:11 PM
What's easy yet difficult at the same time?
A challenge. Especially the following one...
Given the sworn statements recorded in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381 some five decades ago, Prayer Person isn't a stranger. That much we are sure of. So, that said, Why is it so hard for anyone placing anyone else other than the obvious in Prayer Man's specific position unable to produce a specific name? for him/her?
Why is that simple task so difficult?
Everyone has a name. Everyone else has already shared in sworn testimony where they stood that afternoon (none of them by the way stood in Prayer Man's specific location). For those who wish to override this specific sworn testimony some five decades ago, just give either of your choice a specific name.
Again, the simple challenge here for everyone in the prayer person and/or prayer woman camps, just account for either a prayer person or prayer woman in that specific location with a specific name. I'm going on record here and saying it cannot be done. There's a simple reason for that. I think deep down we all know why. But, Of course, admitting the same may be akin to honoring a dental appointment for some.
Make no mistake here, It's pretty obvious (there's a person there), Prayer Man is a reality; however, we have yet to hear anyone disputing that it is the wrongfully accused, simply give their figure, her/him/it, a specific name. Why?
More in depth analysis about Prayer Man is only a click away ---Ã
http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
So far in this debate we have only one specific name already provided as a strong possibility (1)
prayer woman failed miserably to offer a specific name (0) Why?
prayer person fails to offer a specific name (0) Why?
Everybody has a name.
A challenge. Especially the following one...
Given the sworn statements recorded in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381 some five decades ago, Prayer Person isn't a stranger. That much we are sure of. So, that said, Why is it so hard for anyone placing anyone else other than the obvious in Prayer Man's specific position unable to produce a specific name? for him/her?
Why is that simple task so difficult?
Everyone has a name. Everyone else has already shared in sworn testimony where they stood that afternoon (none of them by the way stood in Prayer Man's specific location). For those who wish to override this specific sworn testimony some five decades ago, just give either of your choice a specific name.
Again, the simple challenge here for everyone in the prayer person and/or prayer woman camps, just account for either a prayer person or prayer woman in that specific location with a specific name. I'm going on record here and saying it cannot be done. There's a simple reason for that. I think deep down we all know why. But, Of course, admitting the same may be akin to honoring a dental appointment for some.
Make no mistake here, It's pretty obvious (there's a person there), Prayer Man is a reality; however, we have yet to hear anyone disputing that it is the wrongfully accused, simply give their figure, her/him/it, a specific name. Why?
More in depth analysis about Prayer Man is only a click away ---Ã
http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
So far in this debate we have only one specific name already provided as a strong possibility (1)
prayer woman failed miserably to offer a specific name (0) Why?
prayer person fails to offer a specific name (0) Why?
Everybody has a name.