24-10-2017, 07:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-10-2017, 10:24 AM by Sandy Larsen.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Kampmark's article is utter garbage.
Quoting Kampmark:
"Historians will be able to bring out modestly updated versions of old texts; official accounts might be slightly adjusted on investigations, locations and suspects, but the conspiracy set is bound to stick with grim determination to ideas long formed and re-enforced by assumptions that refuse revision."
What an idiot.
Okay, not an idiot. But one of those people who speak authoritatively on topics in which they know nothing. Simply because they have an opinion.