A hypothetical discussion on the JFK assassination

[Magda Hassan]

Ok

I really didn't mean to ruffle any feathers and for what it is worth I don't believe that he acted alone (or at all really) and I believe in a massive conspiracy, I was simply trying to think out the square to further my understanding.

To Mr Drago

Even though your answer was very direct, I see your point.

Thanks all for responding.

That's alright Mark. The trick is not to be in the square to start with. That's where they want you - all confined and limited. Don't accept their parameters. They lead nowhere.

Right. Exactly. They've framed the narrative for decades. And, as the great great (great) George Lakoff frequently points out--"negating the frame evokes the frame." Debating their lies plays directly into their hands.

Don't think of an elephant.
"I'm not a crook."
...
http://www.campusprogress.org/features/1...rge-lakoff

Screw em. We build our own narrative. Let them negate our frame and thereby reinforce it.

Yes. It is amazing that people are still talking about 'lone assassins' at all. The 'official' government position is that it is a conspiracy after all. But that is conveniently forgotten by some and it is never publicised because it doesn't fit the narrative.