13-10-2011, 04:50 PM
I didn't mention Deep Politics but I did manage to get the right words, after a few grasps for words, to express that he managed to write a unique book that possessed the resonance of truth. When I said that I could hear Douglass happily respond in reaction as if I got it. I also managed to express that most readers probably don't register the significance of the diplomatic efforts of the Pope with his intervention between the US and Soviets and how he may have prevented a nuclear war. The Pope had a brilliant stroke of diplomatic genius when he worded his letter in such a way as to recognize the humanistic interests of both the Soviets and Americans. The effect of this was making each side respond to his peace efforts because otherwise they would have violated the Pope's description of themselves. The Pope worded the letter in such a way as to make each side want to one-up the other in their pursuit of this prescribed humanism. I also mentioned that Douglass offered something that got around the usual Lone Nutter interference by focusing on the greater political wavelength surrounding Kennedy and how the evidence for the Assassination was seen much more clearly from that perspective. Once he set the scene he then delivered some arcane evidence of CIA involvement, like the Oswald double and Wayne January witnessing, that finished-off any doubt.
I found Mr Douglass very patient and understanding and realized he knew I was a hack researcher but he offered me advice anyway, and sincerely and patiently tried to help me. He has an almost priestly demeanor.
I found Mr Douglass very patient and understanding and realized he knew I was a hack researcher but he offered me advice anyway, and sincerely and patiently tried to help me. He has an almost priestly demeanor.