Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale

[Peter Lemkin]

Here is another example of Burton's abuse of his position as both
moderator and participant, where I listed resources for research:

I AM RESTORING THIS POST TODAY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2010.

An even better example of Burton's abuse of his position as both
MODERATOR and PARTICIPANT is that he had covertly deleted my
most important post--originally #7 in this thread--in which I out-
lined the resources that I planned to build upon in the course of this
exchange. Today, when I went to take a look, I discovered it had been
DELETED. Fortunately, I had saved that page in my files, so I am able
to restore it. I say to Evan Burton, DO NOT DELETE MY POSTS!

Posted 16 August 2010 - 08:37 PM

The references I cited that Burton claims to have refuted--which I was
then and remain quite sure he has never even studied, at least for the
most part--are the following ten resources. I believe that any of them
offers sufficient reason to doubt that we actually went to the Moon and
that collectively they demonstrate it was virtually impossible to do so.

I include that NASA has "inadvertently" taped over the Moon landing
tapes, no doubt because, with today's digital technology, NASA can
make far better fakes than it could at the time. I especially like the
film, "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?", which offers
dozens of good reasons for doubting that it could have been done.

I am therefore perplexed by Evan Burton's insistence on "debating"
this issue. I gather he wants to "show his stuff". But insofar as the
matter has been settled, I am having a hard time mustering up any
enthusiasm for this exchange. Jack, however, has done exceptional
work on the Apollo photographs, which this thread can showcase.

So I will consult with Jack and pick some of his most interesting and
informative studies to initiate this exchange. It may be slow going,
because it is not my highest priority. But with Jack's assistance and
advice, we can start with the first link I offer below. If Evan can cope
with Jack's studies, we can move from there in the order I have given.

The strongest reason most Americans believe that we went to the
moon is the existence of "moon rocks". As "Moon Movie" explains,
Wernher von Brauhn himself led an expedition to the Antarctic to
collect rocks dislodged from its surface by small astroids, which
were caught in Earth's gravitational field and landed on its surface.

Anyone who wants to understand how easily the moon landings
could have been faked--and actually were, if these studies are
well-founded--should watch the brilliant film, "Capricorn I". If
you grasp the concept, you will appreciate how much more likely
it is that these landings were faked than that they really occurred.

New Work on
Moon Photographs

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html

Russians letting the cat
out of the bag

http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/15...9-moon-0/#

Moon Movie

http://moonmovie.com/

Top Ten Reasons Man
Did Not go to the Moon

http:///www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/default.asp

Did Stanley Kubrick fake
the Moon Landings?

http://www.jayweidner.com/AlchemicalKubrickIIa.html

Conspiracy Theory
Did we land on the moon?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UKiyOScrIY

NASA erased moon footage

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE56F5MK20090716

INTERVIEWS ON "The Real Deal":

http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com

Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Bart Sibrel
"A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon"

Friday, August 28, 2009
Rich DellaRosa
The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax, Part I

Friday, September 4, 2009
Rich DellaRosa
The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax, Part II

PLUS I add one more for good measure:

Gerhard Wisnewski, ONE SMALL STEP:
The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to
Dominate Earth From Space (2007)

As most of the old-timers and originators of the Forum can attest and long before you found you way to the EF, my friend, I was engaged in the same EB abuse of my posts - using his moderator status to close threads he didn't like [one he started!]; ruling in a biased manner on posters, depending on their point of view - not according to any Forum Rules.... I was invited to be moderator to [now I believe] be set up by Herr Walker with the silent backing of others] and shot down and removed. Remain there are your own peril...and that goes to the rest of you who still lurk there and post. :motz: