Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NATO missile shield: WHY?
#5
The above titled article by Rick Rozoff is one of the most important and significant I have read from him - and that is saying a lot because he is a real pro when it comes to Nato and Russia. It has a lot to say about the missile deal that heads this thread but for me, it's significance is in finally confirming what has appeared increasingly obvious (even whilst appearing unbelievable) over the past 12 months or so - namely that Russia appears to have finally thrown its lot in with the Anglo/US/NATO Imperial Project.

The last UN Iranian sanctions vote is perhaps the most obvious piece of evidence but it was only the most high profile of a host of other puzzle pieces forming the whole picture; the picture which the Lisbon NATO summit appears now to have completed. The article deals with all this in detail. It clearly pains its author (as it does me) to reach the conclusions he does but it is practically impossible not to.

I guess the question is whether or not Medvedev can continue to carry his countries military with him. All the stuff detailed in Rozoff's article has to rankle with them big time.

It would be nice to think that Russia is playing a canny game of chess and that we are at mid-game with all to play for. But the evidence says it is far more like an extended end-game, with few pieces left and Russia facing a humiliating defeat.

The article is very long so I haven't posted it in full. Maybe Admins will judge it important enough to archive here. If so go ahead. I'm certainly putting the whole thing up on WikiSpooks.
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Jan Klimkowski - 20-11-2010, 09:43 PM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by David Guyatt - 21-11-2010, 09:49 AM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Peter Lemkin - 21-11-2010, 10:31 AM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Ed Jewett - 22-11-2010, 02:56 AM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Peter Presland - 25-11-2010, 09:06 PM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Jan Klimkowski - 26-11-2010, 07:28 PM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Jan Klimkowski - 19-06-2011, 04:15 PM
NATO missile shield: WHY? - by Ed Jewett - 19-06-2011, 08:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  US & NATO Weep Over Loss of Libyan Oil Ports David Guyatt 1 9,123 26-03-2017, 10:43 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  It's NATO That's Expanding Not Putin: The Ukraine Coup Was The USA's Respons Against Putin for Syria David Guyatt 0 6,519 09-03-2017, 02:06 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  NATO - EU Worried by Bannon Bluntness David Guyatt 0 4,862 22-02-2017, 10:10 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  NATO's Latest Secret Army Lauren Johnson 2 4,643 28-05-2016, 03:23 PM
Last Post: Michael Barwell
  NATO: the US War Wolf in Sheep's Clothing David Guyatt 0 3,542 24-05-2016, 08:07 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  The Need to Boost Defence Spending in NATO David Guyatt 9 9,915 04-03-2016, 06:39 PM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  NATO Newport David Guyatt 0 2,942 11-09-2014, 10:56 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  NATO - when the tough get going David Guyatt 2 3,779 30-08-2014, 01:42 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Serbian Defense Minister: All Of Europe Belongs To NATO Magda Hassan 4 4,106 06-12-2013, 11:10 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Sweden: From Neutrality to NATO Magda Hassan 5 4,756 08-07-2013, 04:55 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)