06-04-2011, 10:04 AM
For L.R. Trotter regarding sourcing the 1,000/2,000-piece proposition:
Junkkarinen, a doubter, uses the analogy of a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle, which is complicated enough. But the box of the JFK assassination puzzle has 2,000 pieces. To solve it, you must first figure out which 1,000 pieces don't fit.
http://www.trutv.com/conspiracy/assassin...ction.html
For David Talbot, James Douglass, Oliver Stone, now is the time to collaborate on the most needed screenplay, that dramatic construct to supplant the official propaganda with a vision of truth.
David Talbot is aware of the truth and embittered by the Kafka Castle's quarantine of his work.
Stone was able to present his powerful statement, as was James Douglass. Talbot with his experience in both the guts of the assassination and the gutlessness of Hollywood may provide the complement for the current needful thing: a semicentennial film.
Stone's 1991 JFK presented Jim Garrison in a dramatic courtroom setting utilizing the Zapruder film and graphic depictions of the tactical operation.
Douglass' 2008 JFK and the Unspeakable: Why he died and why it matters unfolded as a lyric tale of spiritual growth and epic pursuit of peace prompting the public martyrdom of the uncompromising president.
It's a delight to read Talbot calling Waldron's tedium "convoluted." I found the first volume a titanic disaster, unable to retain buoyancy or make headway, bound for the deep. The intent must be to drown any understanding of the true nature of the powerful.
Tom Hanks' Toy Depository Four rehashing Bugliosi's insulting pronunciamentosall handily explained by Jim DiEugenio http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_review.html, the rehash of the too-cute Posner, who is the apologist for the unforgivable Warren Report.
Stone was attacked, but by whom. By anyone with a brain? By anyone with integrity? Or were his attackers merely the beetles of Byzantium and the shrieking fairies and carping harpies who serve them.
Ninety percent disavow the Warren Report, and moresince Vietnam, no one believes governmentwhy should it be given the field without a fight.
Junkkarinen, a doubter, uses the analogy of a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle, which is complicated enough. But the box of the JFK assassination puzzle has 2,000 pieces. To solve it, you must first figure out which 1,000 pieces don't fit.
http://www.trutv.com/conspiracy/assassin...ction.html
For David Talbot, James Douglass, Oliver Stone, now is the time to collaborate on the most needed screenplay, that dramatic construct to supplant the official propaganda with a vision of truth.
David Talbot is aware of the truth and embittered by the Kafka Castle's quarantine of his work.
Stone was able to present his powerful statement, as was James Douglass. Talbot with his experience in both the guts of the assassination and the gutlessness of Hollywood may provide the complement for the current needful thing: a semicentennial film.
Stone's 1991 JFK presented Jim Garrison in a dramatic courtroom setting utilizing the Zapruder film and graphic depictions of the tactical operation.
Douglass' 2008 JFK and the Unspeakable: Why he died and why it matters unfolded as a lyric tale of spiritual growth and epic pursuit of peace prompting the public martyrdom of the uncompromising president.
It's a delight to read Talbot calling Waldron's tedium "convoluted." I found the first volume a titanic disaster, unable to retain buoyancy or make headway, bound for the deep. The intent must be to drown any understanding of the true nature of the powerful.
Tom Hanks' Toy Depository Four rehashing Bugliosi's insulting pronunciamentosall handily explained by Jim DiEugenio http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_review.html, the rehash of the too-cute Posner, who is the apologist for the unforgivable Warren Report.
Stone was attacked, but by whom. By anyone with a brain? By anyone with integrity? Or were his attackers merely the beetles of Byzantium and the shrieking fairies and carping harpies who serve them.
Ninety percent disavow the Warren Report, and moresince Vietnam, no one believes governmentwhy should it be given the field without a fight.