Lho and the backyard photos

[Peter Lemkin]

Thanks Peter, I just searched for it and found it.

I know what you mean but the beach picture hasn't quite got that "topple" feel about it.

I don't know what to think. 133-A looks odd but would someone go to the trouble of pasting a whole body and create the shadow rather than just paste the head on someone photographed in situ?

I don't think someone would go to that trouble but you never know.

It just doesn't look right.

You are focused on the IMO lesser of many problems with the BYP....Look at the references and watch FAKE. Don't be stuck in a rut. I think the issues with the BYP being tampered with fakes to set up the patsy are completed and set. They represent something like a child's photo with the caption 'Can you find the 25 things wrong with this picture?'. Even when and were they the many versions were found is a suspicious story. They are not real evidence of anything - but the set up of a patsy. I can't think of a single piece of 'evidence' in the 'case' that is real, authentic, untampered with, not planted or some other obstruction of justice. Reject it all. It is all in some sense or in every sense 'fake'.