18-02-2009, 05:59 PM
A sometimes understandable conclusion Charlie, but both his grandparents did die in Nazi camps it seems.
But there are curiosities. For example, this extract from the below linked article:
Well maybe. But if so how do you square this with his big tobacco view that smoking didn't harm a soul -- even after it became scientifically evident that it in fact killed (and kills) millions upon millions upon millions?
My guess is that what was said to a reporter was said for effect more than as a statement of fact. Which, if correct, demonstrates a familiar family pattern only too well imo.
But read on. Oppenheimer eh? Why stop with that? Why not royalty?
http://extras.journalnow.com/lostempire/tob5b.htm
But there are curiosities. For example, this extract from the below linked article:
Quote:Watching the Nazis enforce their brand of truth on Germany bred in Colby a deep distrust for the official version of things
Well maybe. But if so how do you square this with his big tobacco view that smoking didn't harm a soul -- even after it became scientifically evident that it in fact killed (and kills) millions upon millions upon millions?
My guess is that what was said to a reporter was said for effect more than as a statement of fact. Which, if correct, demonstrates a familiar family pattern only too well imo.
But read on. Oppenheimer eh? Why stop with that? Why not royalty?
http://extras.journalnow.com/lostempire/tob5b.htm
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14