05-08-2013, 11:57 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:and here's a list:
14/7
Presentation of motion over 9s prior to release.
Presentation of significant "jolt".
Presentation of data highlighting magnitude of "jolt" Tony's abysmal methods would miss.
15/7
Tony's acceptance of "tilt", though with later repeated and deliberate misinterpretation of the data source.
Presentation of errors in Tony's latest paper.
Tony's acceptance that clean column ends would never collide.
Presentation of to-scale diagram of (really skinny) core column dimensions.
Presentation of tilt data showing Tony's value to be false.
17/7
Presentation of energy required to sever OOS floor structure from perimeter and core.
Request to take early motion, tilt, identified "jolt", perimeter "unzipping", visible misalignment of perimeter columns and relatively tiny core column dimensions onboard.
Presentation of 0.2px Sauret footage displacement for thickest core column misalignment.
Presentation of accurate per-floor masses. (spreadsheet)
Repeated request to Tony to include identified additional factors.
20/7
Presentation of 14 (unanswered) questions.
Query (ignored) of horizontal propogation timing.
Presentation of NW corner velocity plot, showing non-smooth motion history.
Presentation of ROOSD propogation requirements.
Presentation of 14 (ignored) questions.
21.7
Presentation of external material refuting Tony's claims relating to inertia.
Presentation of issues with Tony's motion history data.
Presentation of confirmation of Bazant's data aquisition methods (a ruler stuck on the monitor).
Refudation of false trace data assertions by David Chandler.
21/7
Re-presentation of non-smooth motion history data, identified "jolt" data, early motion data, and 11 (ignored) questions.
22/7
Presentation of additional external comment relating to inertia.
Presentation of refutement to Tony's claim that "jolt" prior to 12ft descent of roofline is impossible.
Re-presentation of external inertia information.
Presentation of accurate storey masses.
Birth of Tony's "24 outer column removal" theory.
Presentation of imagery representing Tony's belief about column buckle mode, and acceptance of such by Tony.
23/7
Questions leading to embellishment of Tony's "24 column" theory.
Questions (ignored) fatal to Tony's new (and old) theory.
Presentation of fatal flaws borne from Tony's new theory.
Presentation of fragility of abstract virtual models.
24/7
Birth of Tony's "24 column removal" causes "perimeter pull-in" theory.
Presentation of imagery showing perimeter "unzipping" along bolted seams.
25/7
Presentation of trace data accuracy details.
scientific rigor is a bitch ain't it?
This all sounds like the neuromuscular spasm or jet effect explanations certain individuals proposed to try and explain away JFK's back and to the left motion once the public finally got to see the Zapruder film, which had been suppressed for 12 years. Of course, they were nonsensical, just like the things you list.
The refutation of Zdenek Bazant's analysis is the same type of thing, as the public is now being shown the kinetic energy was not available to continue the collapse in the North Tower, and all the kings men and all the kings horses can't put Zdenek's story back together again. So now the kings men will just say other things caused it, with the attendant smears of anyone who provides proof that they are just blowing smoke.
It is an old game Jeffrey is playing and people familiar with the Kennedy assassination have seen it before. But don't worry Jeffrey will tell you he is doing it for altruistic reasons, because he doesn't want us to think the buildings were brought down intentionally, and he will swear they weren't, just like certain people told us only Oswald was involved in the shooting during the assassination.