08-08-2013, 01:42 AM
Albert
You raise an interesting question above:
Let us say, for the sake of argument, that the towers were rigged to come down after the planes hit. Why would this have to be done? To hide something concerning the planes or the hijackers? To create even greater terror/spectacle? Or were there other targets of opportunity in the Twin Towers?
Would it have been acceptable for John F. Kennedy to be revived at Parkland? How then the Vietnam War, the perpetuation of the Cold War, the security of the CIA and the Federal Reserve, in short, the world of the security state.
It has been suggested that the psychic energy would have been directed at the surviving skeletons rather than the wars of revenge.
It would be best to destroy utterly the evidence the 9/11 Commission did not look for, the evidence of explosives, molten steel, weakened steel, and the like.
In view of the 1978 operation conducted clandestinely in the City Bank it would be entirely possible for the identified interested parties in Ryan's long work to have enacted the preparations.
Certainly the observables are other than the official explanation.
Van der Lubbe was used to put the NSDAP and Hitler at the levers of power without recourse to parliamentary oversight or electoral recall.
Kennedy removed brought the war and salvation for facilitators LBJ Hoover Marcello plus all that marvelous dope and Kissinger's lurid buzzings in David Rockefeller's shell-like ear of exploitable resources.
To Iraq then, and to Afghanistan.
Note that the Axis of Evil had a short life. CFR coauthors Gates & Brzezinski ended it in 2004 ("Iran: Time for a New Approach") then the fatal NIE of 2007 saying the Ayatollah and his Monkey Boy were only Atoms for Peace niks.
How about the anomalies of 93. And the Pentagon plane that wasn't on tape. Or was it.
We know now that 9/11 and JFK63 were other than advertised--and we may safely say with guilty knowledge.
Thus has it been with TWA 800 and OKCBomb and Waco--and the Boston pressure cooked military triumph over posse comitatus.
We still have the Church Lady assuring us there is nothing to see here.
As though a knee-jerk.
cui bono wasn't Sonny's brother
Every line in these 9/11 threads has a silly refrain--can you hear it
Saw these folks in 66. He was loaded and blowing his lines--they didn't rhyme
She ditched him, got some interesting new parts
he hit a tree when cruise missiles interrupted Harkin's heap-o-dung
You raise an interesting question above:
Let us say, for the sake of argument, that the towers were rigged to come down after the planes hit. Why would this have to be done? To hide something concerning the planes or the hijackers? To create even greater terror/spectacle? Or were there other targets of opportunity in the Twin Towers?
Would it have been acceptable for John F. Kennedy to be revived at Parkland? How then the Vietnam War, the perpetuation of the Cold War, the security of the CIA and the Federal Reserve, in short, the world of the security state.
It has been suggested that the psychic energy would have been directed at the surviving skeletons rather than the wars of revenge.
It would be best to destroy utterly the evidence the 9/11 Commission did not look for, the evidence of explosives, molten steel, weakened steel, and the like.
In view of the 1978 operation conducted clandestinely in the City Bank it would be entirely possible for the identified interested parties in Ryan's long work to have enacted the preparations.
Certainly the observables are other than the official explanation.
Van der Lubbe was used to put the NSDAP and Hitler at the levers of power without recourse to parliamentary oversight or electoral recall.
Kennedy removed brought the war and salvation for facilitators LBJ Hoover Marcello plus all that marvelous dope and Kissinger's lurid buzzings in David Rockefeller's shell-like ear of exploitable resources.
To Iraq then, and to Afghanistan.
Note that the Axis of Evil had a short life. CFR coauthors Gates & Brzezinski ended it in 2004 ("Iran: Time for a New Approach") then the fatal NIE of 2007 saying the Ayatollah and his Monkey Boy were only Atoms for Peace niks.
How about the anomalies of 93. And the Pentagon plane that wasn't on tape. Or was it.
We know now that 9/11 and JFK63 were other than advertised--and we may safely say with guilty knowledge.
Thus has it been with TWA 800 and OKCBomb and Waco--and the Boston pressure cooked military triumph over posse comitatus.
We still have the Church Lady assuring us there is nothing to see here.
As though a knee-jerk.
cui bono wasn't Sonny's brother
Every line in these 9/11 threads has a silly refrain--can you hear it
Saw these folks in 66. He was loaded and blowing his lines--they didn't rhyme
She ditched him, got some interesting new parts
he hit a tree when cruise missiles interrupted Harkin's heap-o-dung