11-08-2013, 08:58 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Albert - I've read your extensive and insistent posts in this thread with a sense of wonder, and have extracted the comments above as an example of your recent enquiries.
You are now writing about the collapse of 9/11 with what appears to be an expert degree of architectural and scientific knowledge.
In my judgement, Tony Szamboti is doing a good job of rebutting your arguments but still you keep jabbing away. Which is fine - that's part of the rationale for DPF. And Tony seems more than able to look after himself and the case he is proposing.
Before seeing these recent exchanges, I would have expected you to be more on Tony Szamboti's side of the argument than Jeffrey Orling's.
Has anything caused you to change your mind?
Jan
I wish people would just answer the arguments. I believe they are sound. If you side with Tony's "A falling mass cannot produce a focused jet" all I can say is good luck to you. "Rebutting"? That statement is inherently preposterous and violates basic scientific principles. And Tony has failed to answer some very key points repeatedly.