13-08-2013, 06:01 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Jeffrey - given that you think nothing of presenting your ill-informed and historically incorrect definitions of matters such as false flag and Gladio in thread after thread, that's a pretty brazen statement.
That is according to you. I'm guessing that you weren't there when the history you allege to know unfolded. You are subscribing to the tale as told by whomever has convinced you they know what happened. It's always like that about history... You don't know it unless you were right there.
I know of Gladio from what I read... and unless and until I read something else... my thinking will not change. However, I am always open to new information. If you think you are not looking at history through some filter you are deluding yourself.
And I stand by that brazen statement.
I am expecting that you'll say something like....(guess just an example) Snowdon is an agent of the CIA or deep state and not a whistle blower at all. While this could be true... and it could be false... the point is anyone who isn't right there can't possibly know. It's only a narrative that you have chosen to believe AS true.
I choose to believe the narrative which seems correct to me.
And I stand by that brazen statement or should I just follow you because you declare you are correct?