Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
If you'll notice Tony ducked and ran from my posts about the "corner" jets. David Chandler gets control of the video microphone and assures us he sees evidence of corner charges in the collapse video. He intones this with the solemn voice of expertise and authority. He then tells us careful measurements were taken of the standing corner column. However Chandler failed to take basic careful measurements of the corner jets themselves. If he had he would realize there's no way they were explosions because even the naked eye can see they happen far too slowly to be blasts caused by explosives. Look at the video. The stainless steel facia falls off slowly as if it was pushed away by natural collapse. There's no doubt that if that facia was blasted by an explosives charge it would have been violently blown-off as the explosives charges in the You-Tube demolition video I posted show. Chandler speaks as if he's a credible expert informing the public but he makes a basic clownish mistake with his corner column charges claim. He's dishonest because he himself realizes this which is why he then adds that perhaps the cut was made with a thermite cutter pack. However any look at the You-Tube video of such thermite cutter packs shows that they burn with extreme intensity and sparkles. The corner columns are right flush with the facade. If such thermite packs were responsible for the corner collapse you would have seen red hot sparkling cutter burns occurring. Look at the video. They're not there.


I pointed-out that Chandler claimed the initiating impetus for the collapse were explosives charges near the 98th floor. This conflicts with Tony's claim that there were no explosives in that area and the collapse was caused by a thermite burn. Tony admitted the smoke billows in the upper section were too slow to be charges and said they were cutter packs instead. This means Tony conflicts directly with David Chandler.


You can't just ignore this stuff and still have credibility.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 15-08-2013, 06:11 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,742 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,059 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 3,638 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,086 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,584 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,533 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 9,697 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,547 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 8,414 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,336 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)