Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Tony:


You haven't answered for the persons who heard the booms outside the building. Nor have you shown why the people outside the building heard them less prominently than those who were inside? They all seem to be describing clearly-heard booms. You're not answering the whole point in its clearly-stated context. So answer my point in relation to the man you admit was outside the tower. He said he clearly heard booms. So were they muffled by the roar or were they audible? Which is it? You're not being honest. You're avoiding the point. There are many other persons in your video who said they heard the booms. You answered by saying there were two firefighters who heard them from inside - but that wasn't the question. The question was how did the blasts heard from outside the building escape Burkett's microphone at the frequency level? If those blasts were loud enough to be heard from outside the building (as you admit) then their blast crack signatures should have been picked-up by Burkett's microphone just like Ashley Banfield's. Banfield said she was 5-10 blocks away, yet her mic allegedly picked-up these explosives signatures. So since you now admit some witnesses heard them from outside the building where then is their signature on Burkett's mic that was literally right under the Tower? Please answer this directly and honestly.


I made a very direct point about there being a provable delay in the dust bursts of at least one second. This proves that the dust bursts could not have been caused by explosives as Chandler contended. Please answer this directly. (Or are you indirectly admitting Chandler showed false information in his video?)


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 18-08-2013, 08:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,742 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,059 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 3,638 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,087 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,584 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,533 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 9,699 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,547 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 8,414 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,336 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)