Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

What does JFK have to do with how the towers fell? We all know that the media and the government spew nonsense... when don't they?

Just because there were visual evidence in both cases does that mean anything? Isn't this rather common for video or stills or whatever to be presented as evidence? What if there were NO visual evidence?

Did the gov and media lie about Deep Water Horizon? Fukushima? Where they false flags by the deep state?

Or is this a matter of when you are a hammer every problem looks like a nail?

I think the evidence is quite clear that the Deep Water Horizon and Fukushima nuclear plant incidents were accidents and very few people doubt it. Arguably they were preventable with the proper decision making, but they were accidents (meaning unintended) nonetheless.

However, the evidence is that the JFK assassination and the collapses of the twin towers and WTC 7 were intended, in other words, not accidents.

It is more a case of whether someone can walk and chew gum. Everything is not likely to be a conspiracy, but there is a reason we have that word in our language. Let the evidence lead where it may is what most rational people would say. So no, everyone here is not a hammer and everything isn't a nail. The problem is with people who want to keep portraying things as accidents that can be clearly seen not to have been once the smoke settles.