20-08-2013, 07:45 PM
Charles, I feel (you don't) that is is mixing apples and oranges. Politics is separate from the technical issues. The DP view is therefore a CT because it supposed that the collapse was the intended outcome and CD was how it was done.
I say there is not enough evidence for or of CD and so one should have the default that it was natural. Now the planes whoch began it then.. could be set up by anyone or group with a motive which is still undefined... but clearly political. If it was some crazy Arabs who were pissed off that would be very different from the inside job. And it may be a joint effort and the hijackers could be dupes and pawns even if they wanted to harm US.
When I say what does 911 collapses have to do with JFK I stand by my position that before you get into political analysis you need to be certain about what actually happened. And just because you think EVERYTHING is part of DP... it may not be true.
I say there is not enough evidence for or of CD and so one should have the default that it was natural. Now the planes whoch began it then.. could be set up by anyone or group with a motive which is still undefined... but clearly political. If it was some crazy Arabs who were pissed off that would be very different from the inside job. And it may be a joint effort and the hijackers could be dupes and pawns even if they wanted to harm US.
When I say what does 911 collapses have to do with JFK I stand by my position that before you get into political analysis you need to be certain about what actually happened. And just because you think EVERYTHING is part of DP... it may not be true.