23-08-2013, 03:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-08-2013, 04:07 AM by Tony Szamboti.)
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Quote:The only person I've observed with any amount of inquisitiveness is Lauren...
Jeffrey, my inquisitiveness comes from my 4 semesters of college calculus, 4 semesters of college physics, and I had started into the upper division of chemistry when I decided to switch majors to philosophy. Non of that is enough to even pretend to think like a structural engineer. But as I read your explanations, looked at your diagrams and sketches and read Tony's work side-by-side, I have become convinced that your work is deeply flawed. CD is still the best explanation.
deeply flawed?
What are the flaws in my diagrams? I'd like to correct them...
You do realize that Tony's papers have been roundly criticized... or in the common parlance debunked by all sorts of physicists and engineers... I posted links... Did you find the critiques deeply flawed too? What were their flaws?
I am sure they would like to correct their mistakes as well.
We have no idea if the people on the JREF and 911 Forums are actually physicists and engineers, like you want to say, as they are all anonymous. That means you can't know either. Regardless of what they are it is a joke that you would say they debunked my work and of course you provide no basis for that, just links to long winded nonsensical threads. No surprise there.
It is talk like this that truly exposes your unjustified bias Jeffrey (meaning you have an agenda) and when you behave like that, and try to fool people, you become deserving of ridicule. You have been told what the problems with your diagrams and sketches are and you haven't changed anything, so it is hard to take you seriously when you say you would like to correct them.