Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

Lauren,

I don't have the time to explain to you what you are clearly incapable of understanding. The top drop sketch sequence was a 1D sequence and was not intended to be represent exactly WHAT happened but suggest a possible sequence... depending of course on actual data inputs. There are no values in the diagrams. The drawing is simply a way to conceptualize what COULD have happened.

Any definitive explanation has to be linked to the actual obervations and data and the physics and engineering as it applies. I don't have that data nor the facility to do the math... and I make no pretense that I do. 911FF have produced the most reliable observations and data and the analysis to go along with it. Tony is making stuff up... and using some math to make it seem like it's a proof of something. He's fooled you but not most physicists and engineers.

There is a lot of garbage published... publishing garbage is not proof of anything.

The motion has been explained.. go read the explanations.

So if I read this right Jeffrey is admitting that he doesn't have the data or the facility to do the math. But then he conversely insists I am making things up and that he can tell when somebody has it right. Sounds like unjustified bias to me.