08-06-2014, 05:07 PM
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 84%"]Documents Reveal NSA Can Crack Online Encryption
By Cully Downer [TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 60%"][/TD]
[TD="width: 40%"] 6/8/14[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 16%"]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Is it possible that the 'Reset the Net' project is already behind the times as far as encryption is concerned?
Experimental Evidence Confirms That D-Wave Systems' Quantum Computers Are Truly 'Quantum'
NSA seeks to build quantum computers that could crack most types of encryption
The Washington Post uses a source to say that we are years away from Quantum computers yet, so what's the truth?
A working quantum computer would open the door to easily breaking the strongest encryption tools in use today, including a standard known as RSA, named for the initials of its creators. RSA scrambles communications, making them unreadable to anyone but the intended recipient, without requiring the use of a shared password. It is commonly used in Web browsers to secure financial transactions and in encrypted e-mails. RSA is used because of the difficulty of factoring the product of two large prime numbers. Breaking the encryption involves finding those two numbers. This cannot be done in a reasonable amount of time on a classical computer.
In 2009, computer scientists using classical methods were able to discover the primes within a 768-bit number, but it took almost two years and hundreds of computers to factor it. The scientists estimated that it would take 1,000 times longer to break a 1,024-bit encryption key, which is commonly used for online transactions.
A large-scale quantum computer, however, could theoretically break a 1,024-bit encryption much faster. Some leading Internet companies are moving to 2,048-bit keys, but even those are thought to be vulnerable to rapid decryption with a quantum computer should one be built successfully. Evidence suggests that at least one type has already been built in the private sector. It would be a stretch for anyone to suggest that the NSA didn't already have at least one itself.:
::
::
:
[TR]
[TD="width: 84%"]Documents Reveal NSA Can Crack Online Encryption
By Cully Downer [TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 60%"][/TD]
[TD="width: 40%"] 6/8/14[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 16%"]
[URL="http://www.opednews.com/author/author4520.html"]
[/URL]
[/URL]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[URL="http://core4.staticworld.net/images/article/2013/02/ransomware-100025456-large.jpg"]![[Image: s_500_core4_staticworld_net_0_ransomware...-large.gif]](http://www.opednews.com/populum/cachedimages/s_500_core4_staticworld_net_0_ransomware-100025456-large.gif)
[/URL]
This is not a new report. Despite our reassurances from some of the free encryption services we cannot know at this point what exactly the NSA can penetrate.[/URL]
Is it possible that the 'Reset the Net' project is already behind the times as far as encryption is concerned?
Experimental Evidence Confirms That D-Wave Systems' Quantum Computers Are Truly 'Quantum'
NSA seeks to build quantum computers that could crack most types of encryption
The Washington Post uses a source to say that we are years away from Quantum computers yet, so what's the truth?
A working quantum computer would open the door to easily breaking the strongest encryption tools in use today, including a standard known as RSA, named for the initials of its creators. RSA scrambles communications, making them unreadable to anyone but the intended recipient, without requiring the use of a shared password. It is commonly used in Web browsers to secure financial transactions and in encrypted e-mails. RSA is used because of the difficulty of factoring the product of two large prime numbers. Breaking the encryption involves finding those two numbers. This cannot be done in a reasonable amount of time on a classical computer.
In 2009, computer scientists using classical methods were able to discover the primes within a 768-bit number, but it took almost two years and hundreds of computers to factor it. The scientists estimated that it would take 1,000 times longer to break a 1,024-bit encryption key, which is commonly used for online transactions.
A large-scale quantum computer, however, could theoretically break a 1,024-bit encryption much faster. Some leading Internet companies are moving to 2,048-bit keys, but even those are thought to be vulnerable to rapid decryption with a quantum computer should one be built successfully. Evidence suggests that at least one type has already been built in the private sector. It would be a stretch for anyone to suggest that the NSA didn't already have at least one itself.:
:::::
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass