Anthony Summers

[Marc Ellis]

I'm starting the last part of Summers' book, NIYL, "Endgame".

I think L.N. Theorists will find precious little to celebrate in this book. If they are doing
a victory dance right ow, they may want to stop and read a copy.

He lays out some very coherent and plausible lines of research. And nowhere is
the lone nut story given any credence or even much consideration.

I think he's especially persuasive on the TSBD & Oswald's whereabouts.
He makes a good case for conspiracy on the Tippet shooting. He's especially
good on the mob's view of RFK & JFK. It seems RFK was waging war on mobleaders
and his tactics were similar to theirs. Abducting & deporting Marcello w/o due process
for instance.

I don't agree with Summers on Garrison. I think he gives him short-shrift.
And I have serious questions about the attempted shooting of General Walker -
not just for Summers, but for anyone.

I'm a novice. I just started reading on this because it is the 50th anniversary.
But the two books I chose to start with, Destiny Betrayed and Not in your Lifetime
I think have given me a pretty good grounding. I'll cross-check some things
on McAdams' site. But I really find the condescending tone of the LN's annoying.
And I find all their explanations of 544 Camp Street dishonest at worst and lame at best.

On 544 Camp Street, the LN'ers need to come up with something more persuasive than what they
have put forward to date. That address is absolutely critical to understanding what happened.

Curious as to why you would "cross check" anything on McAdams' disinfo site.
You will find no truth there.

Dawn

It's just how I do things intellectually. I often check out the opposite POV when I'm learning. What are the weaknesses in an author's conclusions? What's the other side? As I said, I'm just a novice here. Still learning. Is there a more reliable or concise LN site than McAdams'? Let me know what it is. I'll cross-check there.

I agree. To date, McAdams's spin has not fared well against the assertions of DiEugenio. But at least his site spares me the trouble and expense of buying Bugliosi's tome. The first thing I cross-checked was 544 Camp Street. And I already gave my opinion of McAdams' spin on that.