Anthony Summers

[R.K. Locke]

When researching the theory of evolution, would you also go to a Creationist website to cross-reference information? I shouldn't think so.

Isn't that akin to saying - while researching the conspiracy of the JFK assassination would you go to the WCR to cross reference info? We'd EXPECT you to RK...

The KEY to the conspiracy is in the inability of the McAdams' out there to spin sh!t into gold without relying on FAITH...

Creationsim sadly adds FAITH to the equation... FAITH in the stature of the Warren Commissioners to tell US the truth is the only thing a WCR apologist can hang his hat upon.

If one doesn't understand the depth of the argument against, how can one be effective countering it?

We must also differentiate from the EVIDENCE as offered and the COMMENTARY that may come with it.
McAdams can't make an FBI report any less suspect - all he can do is offer his spin...

Yet at the top of the home page he offers this: (I am NOT defending the man, only that the site can be a valuable resource to discover the tactics and POV of the opposition)


Regardless of what you believe, several web sites, mostly conspiracy-oriented are worth checking out. And you may also want to check out my list of recommended books on the assassination
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sites.htm


I would never read Bugliosi's book - why bother when we have the WCR/HSCA/ARRB and others - or any other book that offers OPINIONS on the evidence.
The evidence speaks LOUDLY enough for itself.... and nothing McAdams or DVP or anyone else can do about it other than SPIN IT and L-I-E about it.

Sun Tzu: http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html
All warfare is based on deception.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

I will try to answer your points in order.

1) The Warren Commission Report was discredited decades ago, so no, I don't feel the need to cross reference information with it. The case for conspiracy is proven. Debating and/or analysing the contents of the WCR at this stage is a complete waste of time as far as I'm concerned.

2) Your point here seems quite confused. First you say that McAdams et al don't rely on faith, then you say that they do ("FAITH in the stature of the Warren Commissioners to tell US the truth...") Which is it? For what it's worth, I don'tbelieve that McAdams and co. have "faith" in the Commission members at all, but I dothink they rely upon the public's faith in authority and the media to effectively promote their version of events.

3) I think we all understand the depth of the argument against conspiracy: it is about as deep as a puddle of piss. The more we debate with people who have NO interest in establishing the truth the more effectively the lie is perpetuated.

4) All of the evidence is available online without providing traffic to LN websites.

5) I give him no credit whatsoever providing links to "conspiracy-oriented" websites.

6) I agree with you completely that the evidence speaks loudly enough for itself, and I reiterate my previous point that all of the evidence that anybody needs is available on sites that acknowledge the fact of conspiracy.