10-11-2013, 07:00 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Well I guess no one here has read Reclaiming Parkland.
Which kind of hurts really. I mean discussing a 30 year old museum piece instead of a brand new book?
Peter Scott was wrong when he said the first intimation of LHO and the Walker shooting came from the West German paper.
The first person to hint at this was Michael Paine.
I could not fit everything about the Paines into Destiny Betrayed. So I added about six more pages, most of it concerning the Walker shooting, into RP. I think this stuff has never appeared in book form before. Certainly not in any version of Summers' book. When you combine Paine's comments for a newspaper with RUth Paine's production of the so called Walker note, I mean how can anyone not think they are as fishy as two trouts? Especially since there is no way in the world Oswald shot at Walker. To believe that one has to think that 1.) The bullet changed color and calibre en route to the target, or 2.) Oswald had a rifle which fired 30.06 ammo. Sorry, no sale. And Marina has as much credibility as Brennan.
BTW, Martino's stuff is essentially all second and third hand. And it is not nearly as specific as Nagell's. Who I think is a much better witness.
I have just received it so i have not read it yet, but i will soon. I will add it to my list of books for Marc Ellis.