10-11-2013, 07:05 AM
Marc Ellis Wrote:Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:Marc
While discussing Summer's book you refer to Destiny Betrayed and McAdams site.
Now, someone who does not know much about the research community might think
that Summers, McAdams and DiEugenio have the same value, that they are of equal importance.
Which clearly is not the case. McAdams is a waste of time and you have to listen to the experienced
members of this site and stop reading him, is full of disinfo. If you want to learn more about McAdams
visit http://www.ctka.net/2013/mcadams.html and http://www.ctka.net/2013/mcadams_2.html.
So if you want to learn more about the JFK assassination drop McAdams, Summers book is nothing great either (apart what is based in Bill Kelly's work which is good) and read some good books. I can propose some of them which is i have read. There are other great books which i have not read. You have already read Destiny Betrayed, so:
Oswald and the CIA by John Newman
JFK and Vietnam by John Newman
A Certain Arrogance by G.M. Evica
Deep Politics I & II by Peter Dale Scott
The Man who Knew too Much by Dick Russell
Harvey and Lee by John Armostrong
Battling Wall Street by Donald Gibson
A Breach of Trust by Gerald McKnight
JFK and the Unspeakable by Jim Douglass
The Last Investigation by Gaeton Fonzi
it was never my intention to imply they were equal. McAdams' style is to argue a point
and then do a victory dance whether he has proven his point or not.
But my question about Walker came from reading Summers', not McAdams.
Marc, you did exactly that. Instead of writing in bold the following
Now, someone who does not know much about the research community might think
that Summers, McAdams and DiEugenio have the same value, that they are of equal importance. Which clearly is not the case.
you should have done it this way: Now, someone who does not know much about the research community might think that Summers, McAdams and DiEugenio have the same value, that they are of equal importance. Which clearly is not the case.