19-10-2016, 04:48 PM
This is exactly - tho' only a small part of-, what the shitehounds've been doing to me for 5years+ - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Albert_experiment -
"The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child.[SUP][1][/SUP] For this study they chose a nine-month old infant from a hospital referred to as "Albert" for the experiment.[SUP][2][/SUP] Watson followed the procedures which Pavlov had used in his experiments with dogs.[SUP][3][/SUP]Before the experiment, Albert was given a battery of baseline emotional tests: the infant was exposed, briefly and for the first time, to a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, a monkey, masks (with and without hair), cotton, wool, burning newspapers, and otherstimuli. Albert showed no fear of any of these items during the baseline tests.
For the experiment proper, Albert was put on a mattress on a table in the middle of a room. A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert's back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer each time the baby touched the rat. Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear. After several such pairings of the two stimuli, Albert was presented with only the rat. Upon seeing the rat, Albert got very distressed, crying and crawling away. Apparently, the infant associated the white rat with the noise. The rat, originally a neutral stimulus, had become a conditioned stimulus, and it was eliciting an emotional response (conditioned response) similar to the distress (unconditioned response) originally given to the noise (unconditioned stimulus).[SUP][4][/SUP]
In further experiments, Little Albert seemed to generalize his response to the white rat. He became distressed at the sight of several other furry objects, such as a rabbit, a furry dog, and a seal-skin coat, and even a Santa Claus mask with white cotton balls in the beard. However, this stimulus generalization did not extend to everything with hair.[SUP][4][/SUP]
It should be noted that Watson's experiment had many failings by modern standards. For example, a single subject and no control subjects. Most importantly, such an experiment would never be allowed under current law and regulations, as it clearly subjected the infant to severe stress and potential long-term psychological damage"
But they also do it from inside 'your' own mind, via the cortical modem effect, built upon very many false accusations, which they then cross-ref to specific refs/cues/triggers and shitloads of intense & excruciating pain - not just the lightweight 100 neuralgics I get each day, & the hundreds & hundreds of other 'refs' (muscle twitches, neighbours, sirens - woke-up this morning to another barrage of sirens cued - as I said ages ago, so that it is as tho, the same switch that turns-on the siren, sends the 'whispers/img's' etc etc into the mind direct of the sap the shitehounds're making-out to be "gods" to: 8:44am, 1 & a half hrs after sleep, woke to "blew him out of the sky", from nowhere - quite the synthesis - the e-caffeine, the 'cognitive/audio/visual whisper', & the siren, and clicks and slight neuralgics.
Curious, the few "unique" refs, by siren, about 6months ago, maybe 3 of them over a fortnight.
Shitheads.
From the neuro-linguistic bollocks, I get alot of "anchor(s)".
"The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child.[SUP][1][/SUP] For this study they chose a nine-month old infant from a hospital referred to as "Albert" for the experiment.[SUP][2][/SUP] Watson followed the procedures which Pavlov had used in his experiments with dogs.[SUP][3][/SUP]Before the experiment, Albert was given a battery of baseline emotional tests: the infant was exposed, briefly and for the first time, to a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, a monkey, masks (with and without hair), cotton, wool, burning newspapers, and otherstimuli. Albert showed no fear of any of these items during the baseline tests.
For the experiment proper, Albert was put on a mattress on a table in the middle of a room. A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert's back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer each time the baby touched the rat. Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear. After several such pairings of the two stimuli, Albert was presented with only the rat. Upon seeing the rat, Albert got very distressed, crying and crawling away. Apparently, the infant associated the white rat with the noise. The rat, originally a neutral stimulus, had become a conditioned stimulus, and it was eliciting an emotional response (conditioned response) similar to the distress (unconditioned response) originally given to the noise (unconditioned stimulus).[SUP][4][/SUP]
In further experiments, Little Albert seemed to generalize his response to the white rat. He became distressed at the sight of several other furry objects, such as a rabbit, a furry dog, and a seal-skin coat, and even a Santa Claus mask with white cotton balls in the beard. However, this stimulus generalization did not extend to everything with hair.[SUP][4][/SUP]
It should be noted that Watson's experiment had many failings by modern standards. For example, a single subject and no control subjects. Most importantly, such an experiment would never be allowed under current law and regulations, as it clearly subjected the infant to severe stress and potential long-term psychological damage"
But they also do it from inside 'your' own mind, via the cortical modem effect, built upon very many false accusations, which they then cross-ref to specific refs/cues/triggers and shitloads of intense & excruciating pain - not just the lightweight 100 neuralgics I get each day, & the hundreds & hundreds of other 'refs' (muscle twitches, neighbours, sirens - woke-up this morning to another barrage of sirens cued - as I said ages ago, so that it is as tho, the same switch that turns-on the siren, sends the 'whispers/img's' etc etc into the mind direct of the sap the shitehounds're making-out to be "gods" to: 8:44am, 1 & a half hrs after sleep, woke to "blew him out of the sky", from nowhere - quite the synthesis - the e-caffeine, the 'cognitive/audio/visual whisper', & the siren, and clicks and slight neuralgics.
Curious, the few "unique" refs, by siren, about 6months ago, maybe 3 of them over a fortnight.
Shitheads.
From the neuro-linguistic bollocks, I get alot of "anchor(s)".
Martin Luther King - "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
Albert Camus - "The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion".
Douglas MacArthur — "Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons."
Albert Camus - "Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear."
Albert Camus - "The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion".
Douglas MacArthur — "Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons."
Albert Camus - "Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear."