17-03-2019, 05:38 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Scott, its the other way around. He says it was not the Russians.
And so, I stand corrected, I must have miss understood this sentence written above, "So I have difficulty concluding that this is hard evidence of Harriman "lying" about the view of Soviet experts about their involvement (or lack of same) in the assassination."
A promised view of Soviets experts, and Harriman is lying? Don't we all have some theory based off some documentation we call FOIA dumps? Bits and peices are promising, but a mountain is more rewarding.