20-08-2009, 04:09 PM
Thanks Peter. That's a good series of videos; well worth watching IMHO.
The first is a bit tedious. The good woman who provided the first dust samples - her story etc. But they just get better and better. It is only the last half dozen or so that cover the nano-thermite in depth but there's good stuff in the earlier ones too. In particular, I was unaware that NIST had conceded 2 contentious points in their second report on the WT7 collapse; points that the infamous and oft quoted 'Popular Mechanics' debunking article relied on heavilly:
1. That the basement diesel storage tanks played no part in the collapse
2. That the physical damage from the collapsing towers - the 'hollowing out' as it is sometimes referred to by defenders of the official narrative - played no part in the collapse.
I was also unaware that all 70 professors at BYU who attended his original 2005 presentation agreed by show of hands that his findings warranted further investigation. All but one that is who stopped Stephen Jones the following day and told him that, on reflection, he too agreed that further investigation was required.
There are many other fascinating insights too.
On the nano-thermite question Stephen Jones is superb. He meets pretty well all the serious and half serious objections I've come across to date head on and demolishes them impressively. Things like '...well there was aluminium from the planes and ferrous material in the buildings, what he found was a compound/mixture of this stuff etc' or 'It was produced by an advanced type of paint'; and a good few others.
His constant refrain is to challenge both government and other scientists to investigate for themselves and prove him wrong. He is also adamant that there is a lot more of the dust in government custody and that it must be safeguarded at all costs and made available for further analysis.
Jones is a quiet self-deprecating sort of guy but he is quite clearly supremely confident of the scientific integrity of the nano-thermite findings. His two over-riding questions to government are:
1. Who manufactured it?
2. What was it (upwards of 10 tonnes of the stuff) doing in commercial buildings?
The first is a bit tedious. The good woman who provided the first dust samples - her story etc. But they just get better and better. It is only the last half dozen or so that cover the nano-thermite in depth but there's good stuff in the earlier ones too. In particular, I was unaware that NIST had conceded 2 contentious points in their second report on the WT7 collapse; points that the infamous and oft quoted 'Popular Mechanics' debunking article relied on heavilly:
1. That the basement diesel storage tanks played no part in the collapse
2. That the physical damage from the collapsing towers - the 'hollowing out' as it is sometimes referred to by defenders of the official narrative - played no part in the collapse.
I was also unaware that all 70 professors at BYU who attended his original 2005 presentation agreed by show of hands that his findings warranted further investigation. All but one that is who stopped Stephen Jones the following day and told him that, on reflection, he too agreed that further investigation was required.
There are many other fascinating insights too.
On the nano-thermite question Stephen Jones is superb. He meets pretty well all the serious and half serious objections I've come across to date head on and demolishes them impressively. Things like '...well there was aluminium from the planes and ferrous material in the buildings, what he found was a compound/mixture of this stuff etc' or 'It was produced by an advanced type of paint'; and a good few others.
His constant refrain is to challenge both government and other scientists to investigate for themselves and prove him wrong. He is also adamant that there is a lot more of the dust in government custody and that it must be safeguarded at all costs and made available for further analysis.
Jones is a quiet self-deprecating sort of guy but he is quite clearly supremely confident of the scientific integrity of the nano-thermite findings. His two over-riding questions to government are:
1. Who manufactured it?
2. What was it (upwards of 10 tonnes of the stuff) doing in commercial buildings?
Peter Presland
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]