Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ruling by the Supremes
#47
An Amendment to Preclude Corporations from Claiming Bill of Rights Protections

SECTION 1. The U.S. Constitution protects only the rights of living human beings.

SECTION 2. Corporations and other institutions granted the privilege to exist shall be subordinate to any and all laws enacted by citizens and their elected governments.

SECTION 3. Corporations and other for-profit institutions are prohibited from attempting to influence the outcome of elections, legislation or government policy through the use of aggregate resources or by rewarding or repaying employees or directors to exert such influence.

SECTION 4. Congress shall have power to implement this article by appropriate legislation.

More on why we need to revoke corporate constitutional privileges
(a.k.a., corporate personhood)
An Amendment to Reverse Buckley v. Valeo and Dominance of Wealth in Electoral Politics

SECTION 1. For the purposes of providing all citizens, regardless of wealth, a more equal opportunity to influence elections, public policy and run for public office; of furthering the principle of “one person, one vote” and preserving a participatory and democratic republic; as well as the purpose of limiting corruption and the appearance of corruption, we the people declare the unlimited use of money to influence elections incompatible with the principle of equal protection established under the Fourteenth Amendment.

SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to set limits on contributions and expenditures made to influence the outcome of any federal election.

SECTION 3. Each state shall have the power to set limits on contributions and expenditures made to influence the outcome of elections in that state.

SECTION 4. The power of each state to set limits on contributions and expenditures shall extend to all elections in that state, including initiative and referendum elections, as well as the power to lower any federal limits for the election of members of Congress to represent the people of that state.

SECTION 5. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Possible additions/strengthening of Section 1:
Equal protection under the law shall not be abridged or denied on account of wealth, religion, sex, or race.
Include ban on corporate spending within this Amendment, rather than in separate one (see below).
Thanks to Derek Cressman for drafting this Amendment

We've published many article addressing the need to overturn or negate Buckley v. Valeo (see It's Time to Overrule the Supreme Court) and on the need to reverse First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.
An Amendment to Create a Constitutional Right to Vote

If it seems strange to you that we are calling for an amendment to establish something you thought we already had, you may want to read this article first.
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 28

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right to vote.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
SECTION 1. All citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, shall have the right to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides. The right to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, any State, or any other public or private person or entity, except that the United States or any State may establish regulations narrowly tailored to produce efficient and honest elections.
SECTION 2. Each State shall administer public elections in the State in accordance with election performance standards established by the Congress. The Congress shall reconsider such election performance standards at least once every four years to determine if higher standards should be established to reflect improvements in methods and practices regarding the administration of elections.
SECTION 3. Each State shall provide any eligible voter the opportunity to register and vote on the day of any public election.
SECTION 4. Each State and the District constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall establish and abide by rules for appointing its respective number of Electors. Such rules shall provide for the appointment of Electors on the day designated by the Congress for holding an election for President and Vice President and shall ensure that each Elector votes for the candidate for President and Vice President who received a majority of the popular vote in the State or District.

SECTION 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The above resolution was introduced by U.S. Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Illinois).
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Ruling by the Supremes - by Jack White - 23-01-2010, 08:00 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 23-01-2010, 08:30 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 23-01-2010, 09:39 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 23-01-2010, 10:05 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 23-01-2010, 10:57 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Bruce Clemens - 23-01-2010, 05:07 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 23-01-2010, 05:16 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Adele Edisen - 24-01-2010, 01:08 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 24-01-2010, 01:40 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Jack White - 24-01-2010, 04:37 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 09:44 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 10:05 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 10:12 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Dawn Meredith - 24-01-2010, 05:45 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 06:33 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 24-01-2010, 08:27 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 09:22 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 10:00 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 10:14 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 10:24 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 10:31 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 10:34 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 10:37 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 10:46 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 24-01-2010, 11:00 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 24-01-2010, 11:11 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 24-01-2010, 11:21 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Bruce Clemens - 24-01-2010, 11:40 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 25-01-2010, 12:23 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Adele Edisen - 25-01-2010, 04:43 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by John Kowalski - 25-01-2010, 05:30 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 25-01-2010, 05:50 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 25-01-2010, 06:02 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 25-01-2010, 11:08 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Bruce Clemens - 25-01-2010, 01:45 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 25-01-2010, 02:11 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 25-01-2010, 04:40 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Jan Klimkowski - 25-01-2010, 08:02 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by John Kowalski - 25-01-2010, 09:29 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by John Kowalski - 25-01-2010, 09:34 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by John Kowalski - 25-01-2010, 09:57 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 25-01-2010, 10:44 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 26-01-2010, 12:50 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 26-01-2010, 05:01 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 26-01-2010, 05:02 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 26-01-2010, 09:57 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 26-01-2010, 05:18 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Presland - 28-01-2010, 06:41 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Myra Bronstein - 28-01-2010, 08:35 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by David Guyatt - 29-01-2010, 10:21 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 29-01-2010, 11:27 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 29-01-2010, 11:37 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 29-01-2010, 09:24 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 30-01-2010, 01:45 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Magda Hassan - 30-01-2010, 02:01 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 30-01-2010, 02:46 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 30-01-2010, 03:43 AM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Ed Jewett - 30-01-2010, 03:54 PM
Ruling by the Supremes - by Peter Lemkin - 21-01-2011, 09:05 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  US Supreme Court blocks lower court's ruling on Texas new discriminatory voter ID law Drew Phipps 0 2,520 18-10-2014, 06:47 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  The Supremes Do It Again and Again and Again....Democracy in USA is DEAD! Peter Lemkin 2 2,720 04-04-2014, 05:40 AM
Last Post: Albert Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)