30-07-2013, 11:24 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Cameron has announced a "crackdown" on "web porn" today.Rather than control the internet, an impossible and ridiculous task, it is better if free internet filters can be provided to those that request them. Much cheaper and leaves every one else in peace.
Here's an expert response from the former head of the UK's child abuse investigation unit, stressing that that most paedophiles do not share images of child abuse via google style searches but rather via peer to peer communication.
Peer to peer communication can be policed but it requires specialist teams of child abuse investigators with IT expertise and search warrants.
Oh yeah, and it costs money.
Quote:Paedophiles will 'laugh at' web porn crackdown, says ex police chief
New rules: The Prime Minister said he wants Britain to be the best place to raise a family
........
But challenged whether Page Three-style images of topless women should be banned from newspapers, he refused, saying: "It's an issue of personal choice whether people buy a newspaper or not."
If Cameron wants Britain to be the best place to raise a family he needs to abolish the Tories, arrest his friends the bankers, abolish monetarism, fully fund the NHS and public education and stop using homes as casino chips and promoting landlordism. Internet pornography is the least of it. And he doesn't want to deal with pornography on paper just the internet? WTF? There is a choice in both as the consumer.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.