Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale

[Peter Dawson]

Excuse me for suggesting that at times Jim's academic talk
needs an interpreter. Let me try:

Jim's logic is impeccable. It may be too difficult for some to understand,
BUT WHETHER THE FILM IS REAL OR FAKE IS NOT IMPORTANT under
Jim's analysis. If it is real it proves Apollo fakery. If it is fake it proves Apollo
fakery. Am I right, Jim?

Sometimes Jim's theses are too academic. He sometimes needs his thoughts
translated into SIMPLE TALK for ordinary people like some of us. (see above)

So either way, in simple talk, Jim's argument is correct.

Jack

The footage is an acknowledged spoof, so it has very little to do with the actual Apollo program, and can say nothing conclusive about whether the moon landings were faked or not.