16-10-2015, 11:43 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:Tom: Your research on Reed has unearthed some sinister evidence. He's a Banker!
(Boo!...Hiss!)
And a banker for the Lions Eye Bank, which (I presume) has some connection to the Lions' Club, and of course from there to freemasonry and the Templars etc...
Seriously, it is curious how his REMF Army experience, and his well known love for bowling and hiking, qualifies him to be a bank President upon retirement from the Army.
Yup..... a well known CIA or mil intel "front" role. I'm going to check the Baylor archive donated by John Armstrong, but I'm getting the impression he did no independent research on Stuart L. Reed, as he has Reed dropping out
of "sight," the same damning device author Janney featured to turn Crump murder trial witness Mitchell into the CIA "wet work" operator assassin of Mary Meyer.
If the Lions eye bank is still in business, I wonder if they exchange carnival barker eyes for plain ole prying eyes, like the ones a lot of the rest of use to attempt to be accurate much more often than not.
Quote:http://harveyandlee.net/November/November_22.htm
HARVEY, WEARING A LONG-SLEEVED BROWN SHIRT, LEAVES DEALEY PLAZA
.................
......NOTE: Stuart L. Reed took a second photograph of McWatters' bus a few minutes later while the bus was stalled in traffic close to the TSBD. This was very near the time two police officers boarded the bus, looking for HARVEY Oswald. Reed then took a photo of the 6th floor window of the TSBD, and one hour later he took several photos of HARVEY Oswald as he was being escorted from the Texas Theater in handcuffs. Stuart Reed took all of these photos, which sequentially followed Oswald's movements, within 1 1/2 hours. Reed dropped his film off at a photo lab in Dallas, and then hurried to New Orleans to catch a boat to the Canal Zone. Prior to boarding the boat, Reed signed an authorization that allowed the FBI to pick up his developed photo slides in Dallas. The FBI told the WC that a government executive (Reed), answering to the military, took the photos. This seemed to satisfy the WC, and Reed dropped out of sight without ever seeing his photos........
Reed simply returned to work after vacationing at his Dallas residence occupied at the time by his daughter. We do not know when "he" took the snap shots of the bus or of the TSBD window, now do we? I've actually done and shared
research on Reed, proving he was not "out of sight". The HSCA could have pursued him, and the FBI could also have on behalf or the WC. I suspect, but have no way of confirming, that Reed may have simply been a front for several army intel photographers which would explain, if all the photos attributed to Reed were taken at the times Armstrong is inferring they were taken, how others besides the shots in front of the Texas Theater seem too relevant and well timed to have been randomly snapped by a "tourist". IOW, the Reed photos could have come from film pooled from several cameras. It seems routine for this sort of surveillance to be covered up with "a vacationing tourist" in a rush to get on a slow boat to Panama scenario, by an FBI cooperating with military intel.
Does anyone accept that a line repairr technician just happened to listen in on a 1:00 pm tel con, a collect call between Michael and Ruth Paine in which one said to the other that they both knew who was responsible for JFK's murder?
I think the Stuart L. Reed photos were presented in the same SOP as that allegedly accidentally obtained tel con intel. Bill Kelly has posted in the past his opinion that Ruth went to Michael's office and Michael was not yet back from lunch at a bowling alley that the testimony of his lunch campanion and co-worker Frank S. did not corroborate, and finding Michael's office empty, called her own number collect from the phone on Michael's Bell Helio desk, and the tel
con was recorded by Bell internal security. As in the Reed photo scenario, it is reasonable that Reed's name was presented to conceal sources and methods, and the FBI had an ongoing technical installed on Ruth's Irving home phone for
sometime before 22 November, and how could the WC have ever explained that illegal monitoring to the American people?
I expect much of what is perceived as an all encompassing criminal cover up of the JFK assassination crime itself is actually too many cover ups of numerous illegal domestic surveillance that was SOP and still is. It fascinates me to
observe the reactions of those who do not appreciate seeing any air let out of any of the balloons no matter if they should be inflated in the first place.
The government did not behave candidly or transparently. Does that entitle us to behave similarly? Is commitment to accurate and well supported detail really an indication of an FBI, WC, or a CIA "apologist" or is claiming that it is, merely an excuse for
pushing a particular belief system?
The choice of the photographed subjects is another matter, entirely. It is curious, it seems troubling. My point about Roger Craig is that it is a leap to proceed on his word. That fact was wiped away with a few keystrokes. It is also
ridiculous to quote from "Fritz's notes" if you are in the midst of declaring Roger Craig a reliable source and condemning anything and everything sourced from DPD, FBI, or CIA. It makes for an incoherent read.
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.