19-10-2015, 01:42 AM
Tom....
I'm not quite sure what your points are for at least some of the cut-and-paste the material you have posted here. Nothing you have put forth explains how a guy living in the Canal Zone can just happen to make all those remarkable shots around the assassination of JFK. Your hard work attempting to discredit Roger Craig is noted, and is a VERY old story, but I believe Don Jeffries made a more succinct rebuttal to it above than I can offer.
What puzzles me most are some of your pastes of well-known information from obscure sources that makes it all seem so mysterious, when in reality it is covered much better elsewhere. I'll take just one example, the last one from your post above. There, you post some excerpts typed by a John Woods about the George Applin sighting of Jack Ruby at the Texas Theater.
Although neither you nor the original poster bothered to make a real citation, you are both referring to the March 11, 1979 Earl Golz article that appeared on page 32A of the Dallas Morning News. This has been covered quite extensively in the JFK literature, most recently (that I'm aware of anyway) by Jim Douglass in JFK and the Unspeakable. Here's how Jim wrote it up:
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7564&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7564&stc=1)
You seem intent on tossing a few insults our way, and so I'm curious. Do you believe there was a conspiracy to kill JFK? Do you think the WC essentially got it right?
I'm not quite sure what your points are for at least some of the cut-and-paste the material you have posted here. Nothing you have put forth explains how a guy living in the Canal Zone can just happen to make all those remarkable shots around the assassination of JFK. Your hard work attempting to discredit Roger Craig is noted, and is a VERY old story, but I believe Don Jeffries made a more succinct rebuttal to it above than I can offer.
What puzzles me most are some of your pastes of well-known information from obscure sources that makes it all seem so mysterious, when in reality it is covered much better elsewhere. I'll take just one example, the last one from your post above. There, you post some excerpts typed by a John Woods about the George Applin sighting of Jack Ruby at the Texas Theater.
Although neither you nor the original poster bothered to make a real citation, you are both referring to the March 11, 1979 Earl Golz article that appeared on page 32A of the Dallas Morning News. This has been covered quite extensively in the JFK literature, most recently (that I'm aware of anyway) by Jim Douglass in JFK and the Unspeakable. Here's how Jim wrote it up:
You seem intent on tossing a few insults our way, and so I'm curious. Do you believe there was a conspiracy to kill JFK? Do you think the WC essentially got it right?
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996