14-03-2015, 04:00 PM
Jim Hargrove Wrote:When they appeared together recently, both Oliver Stone and James Douglass indicated that two Oswalds was the only scenario that made sense, at least on assassination day and the weeks leading up to it. Last year, David Mantik sent John a photo of Harvey and Lee sitting on his nightstand, indicating it was his favorite book about the assassination.
Nevertheless, some competent researchers remain skeptical about the central premise of H&L, though they often praise JA for his work on the rifle and revolver, Mexico City, and Jack Ruby, for example. It is not an easy interpretation to accept. I started concentrating on John's work more than 15 years ago, and I wasn't totally convinced he was right until a year or more into it. Now it seems completely obvious to me. To my mind, there's just no other way to understand the legend of "Lee Harvey Oswald."
After pretty much ignoring my website for a decade and a half or so, last year John suddenly began paying attention to it, and now it has become his primary channel to release new material, which is sure a kick for me! I've been campaigning for a year to do a major new write-up on the site, the web's main missing ingredient from the LHO saga, and work on it should be starting soon.
Jim
HarveyandLee.net
Good to know. That more serious researchers are taking this seriously. Indeed John has become very active, sad for me at a time when I am just burned out on all things JFK assassination. We talk often and he bounces things off me which hold my interest but after spending most of my adult life reading almost nothing but JFK assassination books, I am at least taking a break to enjoy some fiction. Of course one could easily spend days on these sites, DPF and or harveyandlee.net.
Dawn