11-07-2011, 06:03 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:The problem with Mr. Fetzer is he is clearly a copy and paste kinda guy and then throws in some flawed "it-looks-like-a-duck" thinking which he passes off as "scientific analysis".
First of all, nothing could be farther from the truth, Mr. Orling. Jim has authored 29 books -- and I assure you they are not full of "copy and paste" material.
Quote:This "it-looks-like-a-duck" thinking is what is crippling real scientific inquiry as truthers are convinced that even a four year old can understand what they see... it's so obvious!.
A bit of a straw man argument there.
Quote:Unfortunately this along with the way Hollywood has dumbed down most people to how the world actually works is a major barrier to scientific inquiry into 9/11.
Non-sequitor.
Quote:What you get is pseudo science by "high school" teachers who want to use 911 as a lesson in Newton's laws... but fail to bother to look at all the physics which refined and carried his work further... and resulted in engineering practice which in many cases is based on empirical testing.
To which "high school" teachers are you referring in the above statement? I am unaware that the majority of scientists with a dissenting opinion about this subject are high school teachers...and even if they were, that would not serve as a valid argument to refute their position. Newton's laws prevail until a "body" approaches the speed of light. The planes (if that's what they were) did not approach 186,000 miles per second.
Quote:Garbage in = garbage out
You got that part right.
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)