05-12-2011, 10:38 PM
Since the US admits Al Qaeda is mostly wiped-out what enemy threat were they overturning the Constitution for with this recent domestic security act?
Someone should demand president Obama explain how this constitutes the "Change" he promised which got him elected?
Since this new law appears to be based solely on a need to overcome constitutional restrictions it should be rejected and punished. Really, the 93 representatives who voted for it should be jailed. The new law is clearly intended to protect the previous violations of the government from democratic control. There was clearly an illegal lack of any questions whatsoever over whether this was necessary at all or if there was even a threat that justified it. There was no review over how this illegal militarization of America affected our democracy. This is a military coup by incremental bureacratic process. It needs a clear and immediate response.
Someone should demand president Obama explain how this constitutes the "Change" he promised which got him elected?
Since this new law appears to be based solely on a need to overcome constitutional restrictions it should be rejected and punished. Really, the 93 representatives who voted for it should be jailed. The new law is clearly intended to protect the previous violations of the government from democratic control. There was clearly an illegal lack of any questions whatsoever over whether this was necessary at all or if there was even a threat that justified it. There was no review over how this illegal militarization of America affected our democracy. This is a military coup by incremental bureacratic process. It needs a clear and immediate response.